Estimated reading time: 7 minute(s)
Why estimating forage intake is important?
Estimating forage intake in grazing animals is critical not only to understand grazing animal behaviours and nutrition, but also to improve grassland management and production systems in a given area. Forage intake is perhaps the most important variable that determines animal performance; voluntary feeding is generally correlated with the amount of nutrients that can be extracted from the forages.
How to estimate forage intake
Forage intake serves as a means of explaining differences in animal performance between different species. Additionally, it provides a general explanation of different grazing systems and management practices. Various methods have been developed to assess the feed consumption of different livestock’s. Such methods rely on techniques imposing minimal disturbance to the normal grazing activity of animals, accurate and precise, applicable to individual animals, applicable to all types of forage, and based on easily determined chemical components.
These methods can can be divided into three groups:
- The animal-based methods: involves an estimation of the faeces produced, and the digestibility of the grazed forages.
- The vegetation based methods: involves estimating forages intake from the difference between the forages mass present on the ground before input and after output from the animals.
- The feeding behavior methods: based on the weight of each bite, the biting rate and the grazing time.
Advantages and disadvantages of the feed consumption estimation methods
Plants based method
It imposes little interference on the animal, but the application is limited to specific grazing situations and it can only provide an estimate of the mean intake of a group. This method does not allow data to be collected from individual animals, unless a single animal is kept on each plot.
|Forage composition||Forage plucking||Sample free from salivary contamination||Interference with animals|
|Esophageal fistula||Accurate diet sampling||Animal surgery
Biased due to Short period of sampling
|Bite size and count||Few equipment required||Require plants identification|
|N-Alkanes in Faeces||Easy to analyze||Plants low in alkanes have low precision of identification|
Animal based method
This method is applicable in a wide range of grazing circumstances and allow some examination of animal variations. The main sources of error arise from the differences in cutting height of vegetation before and after passage of the animals, from the estimation of vegetation accumulation during grazing, as well as the uncertainties inherent in the measurement of biomass.
|Faecal output||Faecal bags||Actual amount of faeces voided;|
Give rapid results
|Affects animal behaviour|
|Dosed Markers||Actual amount of faeces voided||Rectal grab sampling;
Variation in markers concentration;
|Alkanes||Easy to analyze||Some alkanes can be absorbed in the small intestine|
The feeding behavior method
This method describes the changes in the behavior of animals confronted with modifications in vegetation structure and provide a basis for interpreting the variations of intake observed with vegetation. It is problematic to use this method to estimate herbage intake on a daily basis since the measurement of each of the terms can be a major source of error. The most difficult parameter in this method is to evaluate the average intake per bite. Furthermore the bite size and frequency undergoes considerable modification with the degree of defoliation.
|Diet composition||Hand sampling||Short duration and little equipments required||Subjective;
Does not correspond with actual plant part consumed
|Esophageal fistula||Little animal disturbance;|
Used in both large and small animals
Incomplete recovery of plant parts
Conclusion and recommendations
Forage intake reflects nutritional value and accessibility of standing forage and is important in understanding the relationship of the range parameters to the animal productivity. The measurements of different methods cover a variety of aspects, but to a greater extent include the vegetation characteristics and foraging behavior of animals. Essentially, recommending a specific technique as the best for estimating forage intake is not an easy task. As illustrated in the tables, all techniques have advantages but also have challenges.